South Island Gateway

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

South Island Gateway

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:48 am

I'm not overwhelmingly happy with this image... while it is pretty, what I saw with my eye was stunning... but also stunningly difficult to capture

The pretty little port town on Picton in the Queen Charlotte sounds

Image
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby atencati on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:50 am

Did you use a circ pol for this shot, or any other filers? It doesn't look overexposed, just a lot of extra light.

Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:50 am

MHD - I really like this shot as it has shades of a Japanese type print to it. It would be a great shot to do some heavy PP especially with colours - keep them coming

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:55 am

no filters... CP would have been useless as the angle of the sun was such that the sky would not have been polarised...

most of the light is scattered "god rays"...

yes I love the layered hills effect in this image and it will be the subject of some playing around...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Nicole on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:56 am

I can sympathise as I had the same sorts of problems. I was thinking about a graduated ND filter. That way the foreground details are retained.

It looks very quiet and peaceful.
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:45 pm

Yes you are right! A grad ND filter would have worked great in this situation!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby dooda on Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:28 pm

Man this looks a lot like the Sea to Sky Corridor! I'll have to post some pics to show!
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby beetleboy on Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:04 pm

RE the ND Grad..you could also try taking two exposures in exactly the same spot (assuming you used a tripod) and expose one for the landscape and one for the sky then combine afterwards. I've seen this technique work really well. On the other hand, if you have that shot as a NEF you could get a similar result by processing the NEF twice, once for land, once for sky and then combine.

Liam =] PS - I'm always telling my old man to use this trick but can never remember to do it myself when I'm out and about!!
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:13 pm

Main problem: It was taken from a moving boat :)

But I know what you are talking about...

Shooting NEF only gives you an extra stop either way...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby christiand on Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:41 pm

Hi MHD

I would crop this picture in such a way that the water only makes up about a third of the bottom part. The line between water and land at the moment runs almost through the middle.
I would also give it a stab with levels in photoshop.

Regards
Christiand
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby MHD on Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:29 pm

Not a neat and in the middle fan ;)

I have one that more closely obeys rules of thirds.... But the sky was quite plain...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby christiand on Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:37 pm

another thought,
crop it in such a way that the sky (land and sky) is only taking up a third of the photo and the water becomes dominant.

what do you think ?

Cherrs
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 231 guests