holiday landscapes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

holiday landscapes

Postby nodabs on Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:18 am

just a few landscapes from ocean grove taken over the new years break

Image

Image

differn't day differn't colours
Image

Image

Image

really i'm not particularly happy with any of them while some of the prints look pretty good i think there was alot wrong with them so please critique away
User avatar
nodabs
Member
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Melbourne, Glen Iris

Postby bjporter on Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:38 am

nodabs,

Pic 1
I like the exposure, the only thing that let's it down, in my opinion, is the balance of Sky to Water/Ground. What sort of lens are you using ? Perhaps a wider angle would work better in this instance. Not a bad effort but, I like it.

Pic 2
An improvement to Pic 1, exposure is good also and balance is nice.

Pic 3
Very nice, a bit more light would make this an awesome shot by defining the features a little more, good effort none the less.

Pic 4
Again quite nice exposure but I think the balance ratio is a little out. Perhaps you mean't it to be like that though did you?

Pic 5
Sky looks awesome, lower part could do with some more light like in Pic 3 but that would require some serious post processing to acheive without killing that awesome sky.

Excellent effort.

Cheers
Brad
bjporter
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:39 am
Location: Macquarie Fields, Sydney

Postby nodabs on Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:43 am

wow thatnks for the great critique you. after looking at all of the images i just want to get out and do them all over again.

Pic 1
I like the exposure, the only thing that let's it down, in my opinion, is the balance of Sky to Water/Ground. What sort of lens are you using ? Perhaps a wider angle would work better in this instance. Not a bad effort but, I like it.


Was using the kit lense for all of these and your right the balance of componants is off

Pic 2
An improvement to Pic 1, exposure is good also and balance is nice.


thanks i would have liked to get a little more detail in the boats and water, bracketing and blending would probably help

Pic 3
Very nice, a bit more light would make this an awesome shot by defining the features a little more, good effort none the less.


This one and the ones like it i think i need to re think abit and try to actually make a feature out of something wether that is the line of the lapping water the tunnel of light, but it seems featureless to me

Pic 4
Again quite nice exposure but I think the balance ratio is a little out. Perhaps you mean't it to be like that though did you?


hehe you got me, i was taking another shot and the boat was coming out so i ran down the pier to try and get a more classic leaving the harbour pic but the boat was too far out and i have to zoom too much lost the picture i really wanted and didn't take the time to copose

Pic 5
Sky looks awesome, lower part could do with some more light like in Pic 3 but that would require some serious post processing to acheive without killing that awesome sky.


I think this is another work for bracketing and blending. i was pitch dark and i think this was a 20 or more second exposure. what i think would have been a neat idea is too grab a spotlight and "paint in" the dock. i've been playing with light painting for studio type stuff and it works really well and i'm dying to try out in the field.

thanks again critique like that is what help us improve :)
User avatar
nodabs
Member
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Melbourne, Glen Iris


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests