50mm 1.4 AFS review

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Richard Peters on Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:16 am

Evening all :)

I've just finished my review/initial thoughts of the 50mm AFS. It's much in the same style as my 200-400 review so if you enjoyed that, hopefully you'll enjoy this!

50mm AFS review

Enjoy :)
Richard Peters
Newbie
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:26 am
Location: West London

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby chrisk on Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:58 am

nice review Richard. i concur with most of what you found with a couple of exceptions.

1. i think its very sharp wide open if you nail the shot. certianly sharper than my 1.4D anyway. i think 1.4 is so razor thin we are sometimes mistaking being outside the focal plane with sharpness.

2. i think its inexcusable for it not to focus faster. this is an update to a 20year old lens. an update that wont likely happen again for another 10years. so this is THE best fifty nikon are going to offer in the foreseeable future. (unless there is a 50/1.2 IF AFS for the top end ??).

to the question of does it "need" to focus faster. my answer to that would be...absolutely it does. why shouldn't it ? i love my 1.4G. its tracking AF is excellent but the zero-infinity af-s is dismal considering its an af-s prime...and inexcusabley so.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Richard Peters on Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:44 am

Thanks, glad you liked it :)

Would you say the examples I posted are sharp at 1.4? I know my focus is accurate as in one of those test shots you'll see a tape measure next to the five dollar bill. I lined up a marker with the edge of the bill and when checking at %100my plane of focus is spot on. So either my lens is sharp as it should be and I am being too critical, or it's soft if it's not as sharp as your copy. Would be interested in your thoughts on my examples compared to yours :)

I see where you are coming from totally on the focus speed, it would be nice if it was faster. But what I mean by 'does it need to be' is that this isn't a lens you would use with high speed action and the chances of suddenly needing to focus from min to max are pretty slim, with a motorsport or wildlife lens sure...but on a landscape/portrait lens or general walk about I don't see the focus making you miss a shot. I agree it would have been nice to be faster though, no arguments there :)
Richard Peters
Newbie
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:26 am
Location: West London

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby chrisk on Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:30 am

i'm terrible at judging things from test shots. so i'm not much good at answering your question. the only way i "test" is by taking pics of what i'd normally shoot and judge from that.

these are at 1.4.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/10435080@N00/3132231289/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/10435080@N00/3132231119/

by f2 its already incredibley sharp and at f2.8 its sharper than my 24-70/2.8...no small feat.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Richard Peters on Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:45 am

Thanks for the links. Any unsharpened %100 crops of those, it's impossible to judge sharpness at websize :(
Richard Peters
Newbie
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:26 am
Location: West London

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby ixero on Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:06 am

Thanks for the review. Nice blog as well, I've subscribed to it.
ixero
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:04 pm

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Richard Peters on Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:18 am

Great stuff, glad you enjoy :D ed viewing it
Richard Peters
Newbie
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:26 am
Location: West London

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby NeoTiger on Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:00 pm

Very nice review! :)

I've also just subscribed to your RSS feed.
NeoTiger
Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: Melbourne CBD

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby timlinden on Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:19 pm

Nice review.

As to sharpness here is a 100% untouched one of my rug. I just got mine in the mail today, and it's my second lens (first being the 18-200VR) so I was shocked at how thin the focal plane is. I'm realizing now that the high ISO isn't helping with the sharpness factor but I already got it all uploaded and typed..

http://timlinden.smugmug.com/gallery/75 ... pgREj-O-LB
D300 / 50mm / 1.4 / 1250 ISO

Tim
timlinden
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:08 pm
Location: Rhode Island

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:39 pm

timlinden wrote:Nice review.

As to sharpness here is a 100% untouched one of my rug. I just got mine in the mail today, and it's my second lens (first being the 18-200VR) so I was shocked at how thin the focal plane is. I'm realizing now that the high ISO isn't helping with the sharpness factor but I already got it all uploaded and typed..

http://timlinden.smugmug.com/gallery/75 ... pgREj-O-LB
D300 / 50mm / 1.4 / 1250 ISO

Tim


Tim, I carry the same lenses - the 1.4 is nice and agree with the focal plane - but thats the nice feature. - Matt
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby FrankieP on Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:10 pm

Great review, thanks for sharing - you've [yet] another subscriber! The review has been really helpful as I'm considering either this or the 35mm as my first prime, but am currently researching what the main differences would be as I'm still in my first week of dslring.. :oops: So your review is a great help as the photos you've taken are pretty much what I'd like to do with the lens [albeit much less skillfully hahaha!], and I LOVE it's versatility and DOF.

Thanks again! :up:
Have: Nikon D90.. Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm VRII, Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Tokina AT-X 116 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina AT-X M100 100mm f/2.8 Macro.. Manfrotto 732CY & 484RC2, SB-600, Think Tank gear..
Next: Nikkor AF 35mm f/1.8G, Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Flash..
User avatar
FrankieP
Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:51 pm
Location: Charleville, SW Qld outback, slightly west of the middle of nowhere..

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Richard Peters on Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:10 am

Thanks Franky, glad you found it a good read :D
Richard Peters
Newbie
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:26 am
Location: West London

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:37 pm

I found that my portraits gradually get softer at each stop from f4 to f1.4 with f1.4 being the softest.

Can anybody explain why this lens is not very sharp @ f1.4 as as compared to f4?

Also, I understand that the f1.4 will allow me to keep the shutter quicker in low light, but then what other other benefits comes with the massive price difference you pay for the extra f-stop?
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby chrisk on Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:53 pm

matt, all lens' are sharpest when stopped down and at their weakest at their maximum aperture. here is the MTF chart for the 50/1.4G illustrating exactly what you are talking about. the other reason is that the dof is so razor thin that many people miss the focus point making the lens appear less sharp than it really is.

Image
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:41 am

Rooz wrote:matt, all lens' are sharpest when stopped down and at their weakest at their maximum aperture. here is the MTF chart for the 50/1.4G illustrating exactly what you are talking about. the other reason is that the dof is so razor thin that many people miss the focus point making the lens appear less sharp than it really is.

Image


Thanks Rooz for clearing that up. :cheers: BTW, what does the bar values represent in laymans terms?

- Matt
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby gstark on Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:18 am

MatthewRoberts wrote:I found that my portraits gradually get softer at each stop from f4 to f1.4 with f1.4 being the softest.

Can anybody explain why this lens is not very sharp @ f1.4 as as compared to f4?


Chris's explanation is spot on. You will find this lens to be at its best between around f/5.6 through f/11. You should play with the lens to find its sweet spot, whch is where it will help you to yield magical images.

Also, I understand that the f1.4 will allow me to keep the shutter quicker in low light, but then what other other benefits comes with the massive price difference you pay for the extra f-stop?


The benefits are many, but mainly in just a couple of areas. As you've noted, the larger f-stop means that you have the ability to shoot in lower levels of available light. You need to accept that the lens is not at its sharpest wide open, and also that you have a very limited plane where the image is in focus. But when it may provide you the difference between getting the image, or no image at all, that becomes a very significant point.

The design of the lens is such that, with a suitably wide aperture, it provides your images with suitably soft and more attractive bokeh.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:56 am

gstark wrote:The benefits are many, but mainly in just a couple of areas. As you've noted, the larger f-stop means that you have the ability to shoot in lower levels of available light.


Another benefit, if I am correct, is that the larger aperture will assist in focusing - because the lens is open at 1.4 until the point of shooting, there is more light coming in to allow the camera to focus.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:59 pm

Thanks guys for your simple explanations - and now the hard part is up to me to "yield magical images". :wink:

I really like the creamy backgrounds (bokeh) when doing portraits at home with the kids. It conceals the clutter and makes their faces softer except the eyes which have the focus.

Also, when I use the DOF button (on my D90), I don't see anything different through the viewfinder while this lens is wide open. Can anyone tell me what I am suppose to achieve using this DOF feature :?:
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby digitor on Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:25 pm

MatthewRoberts wrote:Also, when I use the DOF button (on my D90), I don't see anything different through the viewfinder while this lens is wide open. Can anyone tell me what I am suppose to achieve using this DOF feature :?:


Due to the viewfinder optics on your camera, you probably see something like the DOF equivalent to about f2.8 - f4 when the lens is wide open at f1.4 (the normal condition).

When you hit the DOF preview button, the lens will stop down to its set value, so you will see a difference in the viewfinder only if the lens is stopped down to f4 or less. Try setting the lens at f11 or so, and try it then - the image will show more DOF, but will look a bit dim though. The DOF preview on a film camera (or FX) is more representative of what the final image will look like.

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby chrisk on Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:42 pm

MatthewRoberts wrote: BTW, what does the bar values represent in laymans terms?

- Matt


i dont wanna get into the whole pixel peeping thing cos i dont really udnerstand it, sufffice to say that the higher the bars, the sharper the lens. but in case you were so inclined...http://www.imatest.com/docs/sfr_MTFplot.html good luck !! lol

personally, i find mine plenty sharp at 1.4, (in context of the fstop), its certianly way sharper than my 1.4D used to be. i find that at f2 i'm getting excellent sharpness and by 2.8 its really superb. i've heard alot of complaints about it, i can only relay my personal experiences. from f2.8-f8 its pretty much as sharp as my 24-70/2.8.

here's one at 2.8 for ya.
Image
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:07 am

Rooz wrote:its certianly way sharper than my 1.4D used to be

Is this because of the new nano-crystal coating or the wider filter?
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby MatthewRoberts on Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:31 am

OK, I just snapped my daughter holding an imaginary camera (wide open :lol:)

Camera: D90, 50mm AF-S f1.4
Settings: f/2.5, 1/30s, ISO 800, +0.3EV
Image

Thanks again - the results are spectacular! :up:
Last edited by MatthewRoberts on Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“ If you cannot explain it simply, you dont understand it well enough ”
Albert Einstein

D90 / D700 / SB-900 / 50mm 1.4G / 18-200mm / 24-70mm, Manfrotto 190XDB/804RC2
Canon Powershot SX100IS, Canon IXUS 65, Pentax Optio S4
User avatar
MatthewRoberts
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: Prestons, NSW

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby chrisk on Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:58 pm

MatthewRoberts wrote:
Rooz wrote:its certianly way sharper than my 1.4D used to be

Is this because of the new nano-crystal coating or the wider filter?


i wouldnt have the faintest idea. i know the bokeh is smoother cos they have rounded the diaphrams. i just assume its cos of an improved optical design
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: 50mm 1.4 AFS review

Postby Sillumjai on Wed May 27, 2009 3:00 am

If anybody reads Australian Photography magazine, there is a good review of this lens in the May issue. :D
Nikon D300 - 28mm 2.8 - 50mm 1.8 - 180mm 2.8

ttp://www.flickr.com/photos/sillumjai/
Sillumjai
Newbie
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:03 pm


Return to Nikon

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests