Capture Raw Conversion

Tutorials, questions, demos, questionable images ,,,

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Capture Raw Conversion

Postby the foto fanatic on Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:53 pm

I knew that I shouldn't have started this.

I've never used Capture NX for PP. Even when I got a free version with my D300, I stuck to using Lightroom and Photoshop.

The recent release of Capture NX2 didn't tempt me either, but reading a few of the recent posts here that have said that Capture NX gives the best Raw conversion made me try it for that reason.

Here is a photo from my niece's wedding converted in Lightroom and then saved as a JPEG.

Image

Now, here is the same original, converted in Capture NX2 and saved as a JPEG. No different treatment save for a slightly tighter crop that was unintentional and shouldn't matter for the purpose of this exercise.

Image

Now I am thinking that Capture NX does do a better job with the Raw conversion. Better skin tones are obvious here (you can click for larger images if you like), and other comparisons seem to indicate a better tonal range and more accurate colours.

Now what do I do?
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby Glen on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:01 pm

I agree Trevor, the skintones look far better, especially on the bridesmaids
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby kiwi on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:17 pm

My madness, as I agree that Capture NX renders Nikon NEF files better than any other tool. I'm not Robinson Crusoe thinking that of course, Adobe do not have access to the NEF file data.

Anyhow, I still use LR for library functions and also for mass processing JPEG files (sports etc). I'm trying to use LR exclusively but still find myself finishing off the commercial shots in PS3 unfortunately - I'm going to get Kelby's book so I can try to learn more about LR in PP.

But, in contrastm, with all RAW files requiring PP I am using Capture NX

It's not just the better tonality and colours - I really like the preview of changes I can make to the Picture Controls used. To me that helps getting it in-camera right if that makes any sense.

To me though PS3 still offers far more options for spot healing etc etc so I find myself still saving the RAW as a TIFF and opening up some shots in PS3 just to complete the process.

Madness I know. If I found I could use just one software tool for everything that'd be great.
Darren
Nikon D3 and Nikon Glass
User avatar
kiwi
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Arana Hills, Brisbane

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby the foto fanatic on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:55 pm

Yes, that's the madness. No photo-editing software is exactly cheap. Then you find that you need a few of them!

Lightroom is great for organising and global PP. PS3 does give greater control for selection and repair of portions of the image.

But it all starts with the Raw conversion.

I'm off to re-read stubbsy's Lightroom workflow, and ATJ's Lightroom review.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby kiwi on Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:14 pm

I've read ATJ's excellent review, I don't have a link to other other one - have you ?
Darren
Nikon D3 and Nikon Glass
User avatar
kiwi
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Arana Hills, Brisbane

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby ATJ on Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:18 pm

stubbsy's workflow: viewtopic.php?f=48&t=31538
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby the foto fanatic on Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:47 pm

There is also this resource, currently about $25 for an eBook download, that looks to be a quite comprehensive "how to" manual for Capture NX2:

http://www.luminescentphoto.com/
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby Jeff on Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:01 am

I agree Capture NX does a better job.

Jeff
User avatar
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Terrey Hills

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby StarForge on Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:57 pm

Just adding my voice to the chorus, I completely agree that Capture NX is best for converting NEF files to JPG. I always put my NEFs through Capture NX2 before importing into Aperture.
User avatar
StarForge
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:10 pm
Location: Croydon, Adelaide

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby carla_d on Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:08 pm

me too. nothing compares to capture nx.
User avatar
carla_d
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:58 am
Location: Shoreditch - London

Re: Capture Raw Conversion

Postby ozboyerp on Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:36 pm

Agree as Glen,

The skin tone is much better..
:cheers:
User avatar
ozboyerp
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: CBD Melbourne, VIC Australia


Return to Post Processing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests