Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:17 am50 seems to be the number, even though this one is 51.
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://dslrusers.net/
Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:17 amRe: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:01 pmdouble post
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:02 pm......... 50 posts so we do not have to turn the page........ 
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:33 pm50 is okay.
100 would be better.
All posts would be best.
100 would be better.
All posts would be best.
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:17 pmThe more posts the better per page for me ... sometimes I don't see the indicator for multiple pages and miss the second pages, and at the moment when I have read the whole 1st page it can be a pain in the backside to have to click on the link to the post, and then click straight through to the 2nd / 3rd page when you are revisiting a thread with multiple items etc 
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:26 pmI have to admit, 50 post / page is more efficient. Really enjoying the less clicking now 
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:03 pm50 is good...
I'm lazy, so less click of 'next' is better
If this is user changeable setting, I prefer 100 posts IMO.
I'm lazy, so less click of 'next' is better
If this is user changeable setting, I prefer 100 posts IMO.
Re: Why the hell do we have 50 posts per page?
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 12:10 amIm for 50 too...
just gonna have to click 'next' anyways
just gonna have to click 'next' anyways