recent weddingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
recent weddingHere are a couple of images. Those pigeons take off pretty fast.
S5Pro - 12-24mm lens Focal length : 12.0mm (35mm equivalent: 18mm) Exposure time : 0.0010 s (1/1000) Aperture : f/4.0 S5 - 200mm lens Focal length : 200.0mm (35mm equivalent: 300mm) Exposure time : 0.0080 s (1/125) Aperture : f/2.0 Basically right out of the camera. B&W conversion done in Aperture. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Beautiful images Andrew, that 2nd one is sure to make many laugh.
Incidently, how do you find Aperture? Last edited by Geoff on Tue May 08, 2007 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
That second image is an absolute speccy. In fact, I missed it originally - I only saw the kissing couple and thought that the pic was quite average.
But on revisiting - three different expressions on three different faces - all classic. But the boy on the end is an absolute pearler. It just makes me laugh. This is what photography is all about IMO. Something that moves you to tears, laughter - in fact any emotion. What a beauty! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
#2 is great. I could imagine what that little boy is thinking / saying ... "Ohhh Grosssss. Look at that! He'll get girl germs" ... A great capture. Certainly gave me a chuckle when I saw it. Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
Re: recent wedding
They'd be doves wouldn't they? Seriously though ... #2 is an absolutely classic shot! Those expressions are just priceless!
Re: recent weddingYeah doves i guess. All I know is a blink and they're goooone....
Yeah that little guy is like; yuk, girl germs.... In reflection one thing I could have gone better for the second one is lift the ISO a bit to get a little more background. Even though it would have been OOF i think it would have been more visually pleasurable... maybe.. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Re: recent wedding
I think you will find the medical term is Cooties (not sure of the latin name for it). Anyway, lovely photos - the kids' expressions are priceless, however, the only thing that comes to mind is perhaps getting more of the kissing couple in frame? Anyway, the exposure of the white and black looks pretty spot on. Cheers P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Great images
#1 could have been better if there was more scene, you must have been stand very close? #2 Nice expression, agree with the bottom comment
Great images Andrew. They're both going to be keepers for the B&G for years to come.
I'd be interested in your impressions of using the S5Pro now that you've had it a while. Are you getting the dynamic range you'd expect? Do you use it in the wide dynamic range mode (I think that's what it's called). What's it's noise like at high ISO (say 800+)? Do you find the relatively slow frame rate a disadvantage for your wedding work? I have a D70 and D200. I'm thinking of replacing the D70 with a S5 with the objective of having 2 identical bodies (albeit with different menus), one to be used where I need 5fps and one where I need dynamic range and/or high ISO. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Top shots, i don't have the guts to do a wedding yet..
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Andrew
All good but that last shot is a competition winner! It is also a very saleable image. Get some releases for it if you can because it deserves to be published and seen. Regards
Matt. K
Andrew as always 2 inspirational images that illustrate how skill, a good eye and creativity can work together to produce amazing results. # attributes i'm rather short on I'm also very impressed with the fuji's clean images. How does it compare to the Canon 5D? Is it what most say... the Nikon high ISO camera?
cheers marco
#2 is bloody great. Priceless expressions!
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
Hi John, Well the first image posted was taken at ISO 1250. Higher ISO then normal for outdoors, as I wanted some ambient light in the shadowed area of the church. Just behind the B&G. I knew the fuji could handle the highlight of the image with it's expanded DR and I was willing let the raining cloud in the sky, acting like a softbox, clip. At ISO 1250 there is little noise, as you can see. I wouldn't have attempted this shot with with these settings with either D200/D2x. There would have been heaps more clipping, less DR from shadow area in the church and highlights off the birds and clouds, and there would have been heaps more noise in the shadow area. andrew Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Wow Andrew, that's impressive at ISO 1250.
I'm sold and will be ordering one. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|