DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

Photo Competition: Today Show

Let's generate some ideas for places to meet and things to shoot.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Write comments

Postby Geoff on Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:42 pm

An average macro of a bee? $25k? PULLLEAAAAAAAASE!!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
Top

Postby rokkstar on Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:48 pm

$25k for that!!!!!
Fuck me, that guy must be laughing his arse off. What a crock of shit.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200
Top

Postby Geoff on Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:49 pm

rokkstar wrote:$25k for that!!!!!
Fuck me, that guy must be laughing his arse off. What a crock of shit.


Matt - couldn't have said it better myself.....ROFL!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
Top

Postby phillipb on Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:11 pm

Well I was on the right track, but obviously that Bee macro was deemed to be better then this shot I entered.

Image

Oh well.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
Top

Postby mdboo on Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:18 pm

The bee won..... T_T

Very nice bg colour phillipb
The most secure computer in the world is one not connected to the internet. Thats why I recommend Telstra ADSL.
User avatar
mdboo
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:05 pm
Location: CBD-South Australia-D300s
Top

Postby rokkstar on Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:22 pm

phillipb wrote:Well I was on the right track, but obviously that Bee macro was deemed to be better then this shot I entered.


You have got to be shitting me!!! The bee won over that???? You were robbed.
I can't participate in this thread any more because I am getting angry. The quality of images on this site far exceeds that of any of the shots entered.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200
Top

Postby phillipb on Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:27 pm

Don't get me wrong, I wasn't expecting to get anywhere specially since I knew what Scott (MHD) entered. It's more a reflection on the standard of judgeing. They may as well have made it a lucky draw from all the entrants.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
Top

Postby Sheetshooter on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:32 pm

Hey folks,

This sour grapes is doing nothing to elevate anybody's work or the community as a whole.

As an impartial bystander who has worked as a pictorial editor for national publications I can see the reasons for their choices and I can also see the reasons why some other shots might not be selected.

If you didn't win, you didn't win. Get over it and move on before your angst spoils your enjoyment.

Better luck next time.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt
Top

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm

Whilst I do agree that sour grapes isn't really all that useful, I'm inclined to say that none of what's happening here really is.

By and large, this competition's winners do suck.

And I say that nicely.

Then again, we all probably expected it.

It was run by PICA and a Channel 9 show. :lol:
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
Top

Postby kinetic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:10 pm

Maybe they run on the "Picture of the Week" principle - ie "We picked it coz we like it"! :roll:

Disclaimer: The comment above was made with tongue planted firmly in cheek! :lol: :lol: :lol:
kinetic
Member
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:17 am
Location: North Ipswich
Top

Postby stubbsy on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:16 pm

Given the prizes you'd have to say they got thousands of entries. Each would have got a cursory glance at best. In effect it WAS a lucky dip and that's what I expected and why I didn't enter.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
Top

Postby rokkstar on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:48 pm

I just want to be clear that my rant wasn't sour grapes...I didn't enter.
I just think for a competition that was running prizes better than any photo competition I have seen, both here and the UK for amateurs, the winning entry lacks..........erm.......well, it just lacks.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200
Top

Postby Sheetshooter on Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:05 pm

Lacks what??
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt
Top

Postby rokkstar on Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:17 pm

$25,000 worth of quality!

IMO.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200
Top
Previous
Write comments

Return to Shooting and meeting ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2