| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by PiroStitch on Sun May 15, 2005 1:44 am
 
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by the foto fanatic on Sun May 15, 2005 9:23 am
 Hi Piro.
 Well done on the night shots.     The church is well suited to the B&W treatment.
 The last image is the only one I don't particularly care for - I see that it was an 8 sec exposure, so the camera must have been on a  tripod, so I can only assume that you intended the camera to be tilted. Unfortunately, that angle emphasises the WA tendency for the building to appear as if it is toppling over (seeing that it is Parliament House, perhaps not a bad idea     ), but not an effect I greatly admire in photos.
 Others may have different views, of course. 
			
				 the foto fanatic
Moderator Posts: 4212Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pmLocation: Teneriffe, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by mic on Sun May 15, 2005 1:20 pm
 Wayne, great stuff, I love the 2nd one if somehow you can get rid of the bit of building on the left and straighten it so it is perfectly vertical i reckon thats a top shot.
 Mic.    
			
				 mic
Retired Egg Flipper Posts: 2167Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pmLocation: Glen Waverly VIC 
 
		
		
			
			
 by mudder on Sun May 15, 2005 2:21 pm
 G'day Piro,
 Really like the B&W treatment on the church, gives it an eerie, spooky feel... The lit branches in the first really suit the spookie, scary sort of feel they have (well at least to me)  Aka Andrew 
			
				 mudder
Senior Member Posts: 3020Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pmLocation: Melbourne - Burwood East
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by PiroStitch on Sun May 15, 2005 2:53 pm
 Thanks for the comments    Cricketfan, I see your point     I wasn't paying too much attention to the verticals at the time and during pp     Mic, I seriously considered taking out part of the church as it really unbalanced the photo but thought I'd leave it in to see what others had to say     I think i'll remove it.
 Andrew, when I first saw the branch in front of the church my first immediate thought was of LOTR and the white tree of Gondor.  In the colour version, it didn't look right...so glad I converted it to b&w   
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Alex on Sun May 15, 2005 4:02 pm
 Wayne,
 Can't see the photos...
 
 Alex
 
			
				 Alex
Senior Member Posts: 3465Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pmLocation: Melbourne - Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by PiroStitch on Sun May 15, 2005 4:19 pm
 Try refreshing     I know the server's not down    
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Alex on Sun May 15, 2005 6:16 pm
 Excellent shots, all of them. I especially like the fountain ones. Did you use tripod for the fountain ones? What was the shutter speed? Thanks
 Alex
 
			
				 Alex
Senior Member Posts: 3465Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pmLocation: Melbourne - Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by PiroStitch on Sun May 15, 2005 6:26 pm
 Thanks Alex    Fountain 1:
 15s
 f13
 Fountain 2:
 15s
 f16 
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Mon May 16, 2005 8:42 am
 Like your fountain images Piro 
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by yeocsa on Mon May 16, 2005 10:41 am
 Hi
 i like the first one and the foundation pics.  personally, i would prefer a shorter exposure time cos the white is over exposed - too constrasty against the background.
 
 regards,
 
 Arthur
 
			
				yeocsa
			Senior Member Posts: 966Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pmLocation: Melbourne 
 
		
		
			
			
 by meicw on Mon May 16, 2005 11:13 am
 Great shots Piro.  I love the 3rd one of St Pauls. Gives the impression of aloofness and solidarity.
 Regards
 Meicw
 
			
				meicw
			Member Posts: 389Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pmLocation: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D 
 
		
		
			
			
 by JordanP on Mon May 16, 2005 11:23 am
 Nice work Piro.  I like all but the first one.  I find the blown out tree in the forground overpowering and distracting.  The fountain sots and the 2nd and 3rd shots of the church are my picks.
 Cheers,
 Craig 
			
				 JordanP
Senior Member Posts: 1050Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pmLocation: Lismore, NSW
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Neeper on Mon May 16, 2005 6:14 pm
 The fountain ones are great.  But I don't like the first one.  The bright branches are quite distracting.  It really takes away from the building. Johnny
 D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358
http://www.jtimagesonline.com 
			
				 Neeper
Member Posts: 352Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pmLocation: Calgary, Alberta Canada
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Mon May 16, 2005 6:35 pm
 i really like the first fountain pic. The palm in the background alomost looks like a firework exploding in the distance    Nice effect.Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |