Page 1 of 1
		
			
				Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:40 pmby Reschsmooth
				Interested in your thoughts on the following image in its two variations. 
Specifically, regarding treatment, subject matter and crop. 


Let's try again.
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:43 pmby Matt. K
				Patrick
I can't see the images.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:53 pmby Reschsmooth
				Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.
Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:57 pmby stubbsy
				Reschsmooth wrote:Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.
Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.
 
Patrick
Do you have external links set to No rather than Yes in the settings for that gallery?
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:00 pmby Reschsmooth
				stubbsy wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.
Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.
 
Patrick
Do you have external links set to No rather than Yes in the settings for that gallery?
 
No - set to "yes"
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:31 pmby stubbsy
				OK I can see them now (but they're on flickr instead of SmugMug I see).
My comments - I prefer the landscape crop because I see the entire RHS pear.  I think the lightin works well, BUT (and it's a big but) that brown blob in the background distracts me in both images.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:50 pmby surenj
				I like the tones here but keen to see more of the pears.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:46 pmby Matt. K
				
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:28 pmby Reschsmooth
				Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo?  
 
 Thanks for the feedback, folks.
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:57 pmby zafra52
				I prefer the secon, but the image doesn't come
accros to me a balanced. There is more edge to
the left than to the right.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 pmby gstark
				Reschsmooth wrote:Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo? 
 
I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. 

 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:17 pmby Reschsmooth
				gstark wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo? 
 
I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. 

 
My brother had it on vinyl but I had the separate LPs "Piper at the Gates of Dawn" and "A Saucerful of Secrets". Oh, you weren't talking about Pink Floyd. 

 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:30 pmby gstark
				Reschsmooth wrote:gstark wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo? 
 
I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. 

 
My brother had it on vinyl but I had the separate LPs "Piper at the Gates of Dawn" and "A Saucerful of Secrets". Oh, you weren't talking about Pink Floyd. 

 
Vinyl? Where's the silver halide version?
 
			
		
			
				Re: Still Life
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:22 pmby biggerry
				here's my take, there is no point for the eye to focus on, nothign that pops out and locks the viewer to the image, that makes any/all of the PP treatment a moot point in my book.
Here's an alternative idea for teh second one, recover the highlights a bit, crop to get the one of teh brightest parts in the intersection of the thirds then push the existing PP further to remove more light detail in the image, hence leaving teh viewer with less to look at and more to think about.