A dose of the trots
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:03 am
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:03 amNo, not the trots you were thinking,    pacing, in fact.
  pacing, in fact. 



			 pacing, in fact.
  pacing, in fact. 


A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://dslrusers.net/
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:03 am
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:03 am pacing, in fact.
  pacing, in fact. 


 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:54 am
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:54 am Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:16 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:16 pm Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:31 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:31 pm
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:43 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:43 pm
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:15 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:15 pmWink wrote:Been there, done that... Didn't work.
Do a search for it if you really want a laugh
sirhc55 wrote:Gerry - could you please, please fix your keyboard so that teh becomes the - ta mate
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:41 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:41 pmbiggerry wrote:Wink wrote:Been there, done that... Didn't work.
Do a search for it if you really want a laughsirhc55 wrote:Gerry - could you please, please fix your keyboard so that teh becomes the - ta mate
I did try for a good week to try and nail it everytime...but gave up after that, i even re labelled the keys on the board but that just absolute chaos. but check it... there is one right 'the' in that sentence...woot, i am a recovering 'teh-aholic'
right, now we have that outta our systems lets get back on topic.

 Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:47 am
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:47 ambiggerry wrote:Not your best Norwest and I know you could do better.
#1 whilst the horse is in focus the man is not and to make it worse he is looking just out of frame. My eyes are firstly drawn to teh man due to teh brighter part of teh frame, hence I firstly notice the OOF before i notice the goodness of the horse.
#2 Probably teh best shot, however feels like you missed the composition by a few seconds, too tight imo.
#3 I don't think teh fill lighting works here, it feels a bit unatural and not complimentary - i know that does not make much sense.. but I cannot quite put my finger on it.
hth.

 Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:32 pm
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:32 pm 
  
 Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:33 pm
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:33 pm
 Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:28 pm
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:28 pm ) and if the shot isn't tight the subject and any detail gets lost on the poor quality newsprint. So, as a result,  I always shoot tight and crop even tighter. The shots i post are simply web reduced copies of the edited shots.
 ) and if the shot isn't tight the subject and any detail gets lost on the poor quality newsprint. So, as a result,  I always shoot tight and crop even tighter. The shots i post are simply web reduced copies of the edited shots. 
  Hell, on newsprint both will  look 'double oof', more the pity. How to ruin a decent shot? Put it on newsprint.
 Hell, on newsprint both will  look 'double oof', more the pity. How to ruin a decent shot? Put it on newsprint.   
  Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:05 am
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:05 am Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:06 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:06 pmbiggerry wrote:I reckon the average layman would probably not notice - sometimes its the content that is important rather than the technical side of sharpness.
For papers/rags, i thought supplying slightly wider shots was desirable so the editor can crop to their desire.

 Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:58 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:58 pm Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:36 am
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:36 am
 Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:43 pm
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:43 pmnorwest wrote:The shot below got a half page with a little cropped off both the top (just below the N on the winning post) and bottom. (to the base of the gig wheel)
The name familiar?

 Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:00 pm
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:00 pm