|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by huynhie on Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:52 pm
Greetings all,
I liked this image but the clouds were blown out, so I've devided to emulate a Stubbsy and run it through a filter in PS.
what do you think?
This is the NIK Pastel Filter
This is the NIK Saturate to Brightness filter
BTW if you scroll down to the fifth post you will see me taking the photo
here
-

huynhie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
by Hlop on Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:01 pm
Second one is quite cool and looks artistic. Sorry, I don't like first one - pastel tones are not for me
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by stephen on Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:37 pm
Number two is cool i really like it #1 not so good for me
-
stephen
- Member
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:10 pm
- Location: Perth WA
by avkomp on Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:07 pm
number 1 appears to have a magenta cast on my monitor
definitely benefits from the 2nd filter though
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by BT*ist on Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:02 pm
The brightness of the sky in the first one is too much, I reckon. The second one is very striking : I like it! The texture of the tree is shown very well, and the effect on the paving stones is interesting....
-

BT*ist
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: London, United Kingdom
by Manta on Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:11 pm
As others have said - the first one just doesn't do much.
The second one, however, is really interesting. Would look fabulous with a cloudless sky as that would accentuate the tree and isolate it more.
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|