| If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.
 
		
			Moderators: gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by cordy on Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:57 am
 Hi All,
 I'm in the process of moving from Nikon to Canon (various reasons) and will be picking up either a 20D or 30D in the next few weeks. Being a Nikon person, I have very little idea about Canon lenses and was hoping that someone may have used some of the lenses I am looking at, and be able to provide me with some info regarding their usefullness (ooh thats a new word   )
 I need to choose one of these lenses. I shoot a lot of aviation and sport type stuff, so faster focusing is preferable. Obviously, reach is a bit of a concern, so I am wondering if the Canon teleconverters are ok? Would probably only really match a TC up with the 200mm lenses
 EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
 EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM
 EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
 EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
 Also, a consideration is the EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM, however Im unsure as to how well this fits into my plans as of yet    Cheers,
 Chris 
			
				cordy
			Member Posts: 340Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pmLocation: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by petal666 on Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:46 am
 If you are planning on using teleconverters then there is really only one choice of lens for you, also happens to be the first on your list and I'd say the most expensive. Also the 20D and 30D has a beefed up focus system that is only activated on f2.8 and faster lenses, so again there really in only one choice. Canon 1D III 
			
				 petal666
Senior Member Posts: 737Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 amLocation: Toowng QLD - 1D III
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by DaveB on Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:07 am
 cordy wrote:I'm in the process of moving from Nikon to Canon (various reasons) and will be picking up either a 20D or 30D in the next few weeks.
 Congratulations!   I need to choose one of these lenses.
 Only one? I shoot a lot of aviation and sport type stuff, so faster focusing is preferable.
 If you shoot indoor sport (e.g. basketball) you'll probably want f/2.8, and not too much reach. EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USMA beautiful lens.  The only f/2.8 in your line-up, and great quality.  It is quite large and heavy though.
EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USMVery nice and sharp (and very light in comparison to the f/2.8 ).  For me it's a bit of a "tweener" lens though: if it had IS it'd be a winner.
 Be aware that this lens does not come standard with a tripod foot (for some reason they made it an optional accessory).  Personally I would be factoring the foot into the cost of the lens, but maybe that's just me.
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USMThis has a few too many drawbacks for me to recommend it (e.g. not full-time manual focus override, slow focussing, front filter rotates during focussing, optical quality not quite up to the others, not TC-compatible).
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USMAs big as the 70-200/2.8 (until the 100-400 extends though) this is a nice unit.  It does have its own drawbacks though: f/5.6 means a darker viewfinder and slower focussing, push-pull zoom can turn it into a dust-pump (although in reality this hasn't been a problem for me).  Depending on your subjects, 100mm may be too long for you sometimes.
 I've had one of these since 2000, but if/when Canon comes out with an f/4 version I'd be all over it.
EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USMLike the 70-200/4, it's light, sharp, and with decent focus speed.  Whether the fixed focal length will work for you is a personal decision.
 Obviously, reach is a bit of a concern, so I am wondering if the Canon teleconverters are ok? Would probably only really match a TC up with the 200mm lenses
 The 1.4x TC is great, and I'd have no hesitation using it with any of these (other than the 70-300).  Note that you have to cover a pin to retain AF on the 100-400mm.  The 2x TC does start to intrude on the quality, and will lose AF on the f/4 lenses with a 20D/30D.
 Note that the IS on the 70-200/2.8 IS is "tripod-aware", whereas that on the older 300/4 and 100-400 can get confused on a solid tripod.  I only find this an issue with long exposures, but it's worth mentioning. 
			
				 DaveB
Senior Member Posts: 1850Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pmLocation: Box Hill, Vic 
 
		
		
			
			
 by cordy on Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:29 pm
 Cheers guys, some pretty valuable info there. Think I am definitley heading down the 70-200/2.8 IS USM with a TC 1.4x - Although the 100-400 is real tempting as well.. Decisions Decisions    DaveB: yeah only one for the moment, need get the rest of the options passed by the minister for war and finance   
			
				cordy
			Member Posts: 340Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pmLocation: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by cordy on Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:04 pm
 Well I picked up my 20D on Thursday night, with the 18-55mm lens. Whilst not the greatest lens, it will suffice for the time being. Also picked up a 90-300 USM to fill the gap before I goto America and pick up the 70-200/2.8   
			
				cordy
			Member Posts: 340Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pmLocation: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Big V on Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:28 pm
 Cordy do not understimate the 90-300, this was taken with it..
 Canon 
			
				 Big V
Senior Member Posts: 2301Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 amLocation: Adelaide 
 
 Return to Canon Corral |