Couple of Snowscapes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Couple of Snowscapes

Postby shakey on Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:58 pm

Thought I'd try out the Sigma 10 - 20 mm at the snow. Here's a couple from the top of Zalis (Blue Cow)

Image

1/30, f18, ISO 200 at 11.5 mm

and

Image

1/60, f18, ISO 200 at 11.5 mm. Lotsa lens artifacts from shooting into the sun, but maybe they don't detract from the shot? Interested in opinions
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby jethro on Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:03 pm

Great images in a somewhat overexposed enviroment. Did you use an ND filter?
Jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby admajic on Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:31 pm

I love these shots! Well done. Sad no one commented on these.
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby Ronza on Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:22 pm

Frick, they're awesome images. The blue and the white work well together...
User avatar
Ronza
Member
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: West Lakes, Adelaide

Postby Colcam on Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:26 pm

I can't decide which one I like best. Both are impressive with great colour and you seem to have exposed well in difficult conditions. I like the inclusion of the sun in the 2nd one. I would probably clone/heal out some of the artifacts, but not all. Show us some more from there please? :D :D
Col
Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
User avatar
Colcam
Member
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Pomona, Qld.

Postby DJXtreme on Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:36 pm

number 2 works best for me, the inclusion of the sun is a nice touch. the blue and white colours in both pictures work well though, you've done a great job in such a difficult environment. well done.
Cheers,

Will
DJXtreme
Member
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby shakey on Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:41 pm

Thanks for the comments from all, much appreciated. To address a couple of points. Jethro, ND filter not used. Colcam.. I'll be heading up to Guthega a few more times this season. Hopefully I can get some more photos. With the scarcity of snow at present, things are a bit grim.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby owen on Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:01 am

The first image is terrific. My wife says that you should have the sun in it as in the second image, but I like it how it is. Makes me want to get down there and get some shots.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby obzelite on Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:53 am

I like both the shots, but I have a real feeling that I want to see the bits that are half in frame.
Don't quite know how to put it into words, but with the rock cut in half and branches hanging into the frame I fell like I’m being led to the edge of the picture and i want to see more.

At 11.5mm my only suggestion would be to take some steps back and not make the trees a dominate part of the picture.
Colours great, subjects great and the lens flare works for me, I just don’t feel drawn in if I've made myself clear.
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
User avatar
obzelite
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
Location: Willagee, WA - D90

Postby Killakoala on Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:00 am

Great images. I like them both but as Simon says, there is a bit more PP begging to be done. Perhaps you could crop the tree branch on the right in the first image as the more i look at the image the more noticable it becomes and the rock in the second could do with being removed too, or recrop the image.

A Graduated ND filter would have evened out your exposure much more and would have got you a more agreeable image, even though it is good already. A polariser would really make the blue and white stand out even more than it does. The 10-20 seems to be quite a good lens, as you have shown here.

Remember that the CCD is less forgiving than film where over-exposure is concerned so you have to compensate more for it.

Great work. I look forward to seeing your further work when you get back up there.

(BTW, there's a couple of dust bunnies on the second image, RHS :) )
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Couple of Snowscapes

Postby Colcam on Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:30 pm

shakey wrote:Thought I'd try out the Sigma 10 - 20 mm at the snow. Here's a couple from the top of Zalis (Blue Cow)

Image


I just gave it a quick touch in PS with Shadow/Highlight (highlights only) & some selective levels show what the graduated ND filter may have seen if attached. The peak highs were blown too far to get detail out of here, but with the filter, it would have been good.
Col

Image
Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
User avatar
Colcam
Member
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Pomona, Qld.

Postby shakey on Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:14 pm

obzelite..

I did want to keep more of the rock on the LHS in the frame, but everytime I tried this chap..or one of his kids..kept popping up like some jack in a box.
Image

(this is a low res highly cropped image)

killa...

yeah got lazy about cloning out the dust bunny on the second shot..didn't think anyone would notice. :twisted: I appreciate the other comments. Definitely need a CPL filter ( and maybe a grad ND)

colcam...

Thanks for taking the time to do a bit of PS. You've certainly improved the shot. I did a bit in ACR (Exposure and Shadows) and some sharpening in PS but I don't really know a lot about levels and curves.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby Yi-P on Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:35 pm

Very great captures, its good to see its not snowing that much there as I went over 2 weeks ago, it was heavy snow/rain/ice all the way, just afraid to pull my cam out of the bag, makes me want a D200 even more... lol
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Dug on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:05 pm

Love photo #2 great stuff

Way to cold for me though !!!!!

How did the lens handle the cold? no problems?
Way to much photography gear is never enough!
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby sheepie on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:12 pm

#2 for me also - the inclusion of the sun adds to the extreme nature of the location. Screaming for a bit more PP though, and would like to see the remnants of the rock on the left either cropped or cloned out :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Digidegs on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:30 am

I really like them! Having the sun there somehow makes it for me.
Like nature telling us that even the snow needs the sun?
User avatar
Digidegs
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Perth

Postby Colcam on Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:18 pm

shakey wrote:obzelite..

I did want to keep more of the rock on the LHS in the frame, but everytime I tried this chap..or one of his kids..kept popping up like some jack in a box.


Shoot the shot anyway and clone the buggars out later. The old film limitations take some getting past sometimes. I do the same and have to give myself a nudge now & then.
For education on Levels & curves, try some of the many excellent websites out there like:
http://www.retouchpro.com/
http://www.grafx-design.com/phototut.html
http://www.panosfx.com/index.php?option ... e&Itemid=1
There are many others. Search for Photoshop+tutorials in Google. Don't forget the Adobe site too.
Levels is my first up tool for photo's. I select portions of the image and then apply levels or curves, etc. Maybe we should boost the tutorials section of this forum. I should put my money where my mouth is I guess.
PM me if you have specific questions
Col :)
Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
User avatar
Colcam
Member
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Pomona, Qld.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques