recent wedding

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

recent wedding

Postby padey on Tue May 08, 2007 9:18 pm

Here are a couple of images. Those pigeons take off pretty fast.

S5Pro - 12-24mm lens
Focal length : 12.0mm (35mm equivalent: 18mm)
Exposure time : 0.0010 s (1/1000)
Aperture : f/4.0
Image

S5 - 200mm lens
Focal length : 200.0mm (35mm equivalent: 300mm)
Exposure time : 0.0080 s (1/125)
Aperture : f/2.0
Image

Basically right out of the camera. B&W conversion done in Aperture.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby Geoff on Tue May 08, 2007 9:21 pm

Beautiful images Andrew, that 2nd one is sure to make many laugh.
Incidently, how do you find Aperture?
Last edited by Geoff on Tue May 08, 2007 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Kyle on Tue May 08, 2007 9:31 pm

Love the expression on the little boys face in the 2nd :D
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby asaroha on Tue May 08, 2007 9:36 pm

Beautiful as always. Kodak-moment indeed :D :D :D
Abel

Nikon d80, an ever-changing collection of cheap glass, and 0 art-sense.
User avatar
asaroha
Member
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: Sydney CBD

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue May 08, 2007 9:46 pm

That second image is an absolute speccy. In fact, I missed it originally - I only saw the kissing couple and thought that the pic was quite average.

But on revisiting - three different expressions on three different faces - all classic.

But the boy on the end is an absolute pearler. It just makes me laugh.

This is what photography is all about IMO. Something that moves you to tears, laughter - in fact any emotion.

What a beauty! :D
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby macka on Tue May 08, 2007 9:51 pm

What a classic shot (#2)! :lol:

#1 is so well-timed.

As always, very impressive stuff.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby rflower on Wed May 09, 2007 12:04 am

:agree:

#2 is great. I could imagine what that little boy is thinking / saying ... "Ohhh Grosssss. Look at that! He'll get girl germs" ...

A great capture. Certainly gave me a chuckle when I saw it.
Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G
I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower
If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
User avatar
rflower
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne

Re: recent wedding

Postby young_einstein on Wed May 09, 2007 2:25 am

padey wrote: Those pigeons take off pretty fast.


They'd be doves wouldn't they? ;)

Seriously though ... #2 is an absolutely classic shot! Those expressions are just priceless! :D
young_einstein
Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Caroline Springs, Melbourne

Re: recent wedding

Postby padey on Wed May 09, 2007 8:44 am

Yeah doves i guess. All I know is a blink and they're goooone....

Yeah that little guy is like; yuk, girl germs....

In reflection one thing I could have gone better for the second one is lift the ISO a bit to get a little more background. Even though it would have been OOF i think it would have been more visually pleasurable... maybe..
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Re: recent wedding

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed May 09, 2007 9:04 am

padey wrote:
Yeah that little guy is like; yuk, girl germs....


I think you will find the medical term is Cooties (not sure of the latin name for it).

Anyway, lovely photos - the kids' expressions are priceless, however, the only thing that comes to mind is perhaps getting more of the kissing couple in frame? Anyway, the exposure of the white and black looks pretty spot on.

Cheers

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Oscar on Wed May 09, 2007 9:14 am

Great captures of the moments, Andrew. As usual - well done.

Second shot is just a classic...girl germs indeed!

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby B01NG on Wed May 09, 2007 9:32 am

great shots, i especially like the 2nd one. the faces on those kids are priceless! hahaha
User avatar
B01NG
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: Artarmon

Postby shutterbug on Wed May 09, 2007 11:31 am

Great images

#1 could have been better if there was more scene, you must have been stand very close?

#2 Nice expression, agree with the bottom comment :wink:
In reflection one thing I could have gone better for the second one is lift the ISO a bit to get a little more background. Even though it would have been OOF i think it would have been more visually pleasurable... maybe..
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby johnd on Wed May 09, 2007 2:11 pm

Great images Andrew. They're both going to be keepers for the B&G for years to come.

I'd be interested in your impressions of using the S5Pro now that you've had it a while. Are you getting the dynamic range you'd expect? Do you use it in the wide dynamic range mode (I think that's what it's called). What's it's noise like at high ISO (say 800+)? Do you find the relatively slow frame rate a disadvantage for your wedding work?

I have a D70 and D200. I'm thinking of replacing the D70 with a S5 with the objective of having 2 identical bodies (albeit with different menus), one to be used where I need 5fps and one where I need dynamic range and/or high ISO.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Pehpsi on Wed May 09, 2007 4:46 pm

Top shots, i don't have the guts to do a wedding yet..
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Wed May 09, 2007 6:19 pm

Andrew
All good but that last shot is a competition winner! It is also a very saleable image. Get some releases for it if you can because it deserves to be published and seen.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby marcotrov on Wed May 09, 2007 8:07 pm

Andrew as always 2 inspirational images that illustrate how skill, a good eye and creativity can work together to produce amazing results. # attributes i'm rather short on :) I'm also very impressed with the fuji's clean images. How does it compare to the Canon 5D? Is it what most say... the Nikon high ISO camera?
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby fishafotos on Wed May 09, 2007 9:22 pm

#2 is bloody great. Priceless expressions!
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby padey on Fri May 11, 2007 10:45 am

johnd wrote:Great images Andrew. They're both going to be keepers for the B&G for years to come.

I'd be interested in your impressions of using the S5Pro now that you've had it a while. Are you getting the dynamic range you'd expect? Do you use it in the wide dynamic range mode (I think that's what it's called). What's it's noise like at high ISO (say 800+)? Do you find the relatively slow frame rate a disadvantage for your wedding work?

I have a D70 and D200. I'm thinking of replacing the D70 with a S5 with the objective of having 2 identical bodies (albeit with different menus), one to be used where I need 5fps and one where I need dynamic range and/or high ISO.

Cheers
John


Hi John,

Well the first image posted was taken at ISO 1250. Higher ISO then normal for outdoors, as I wanted some ambient light in the shadowed area of the church. Just behind the B&G. I knew the fuji could handle the highlight of the image with it's expanded DR and I was willing let the raining cloud in the sky, acting like a softbox, clip. At ISO 1250 there is little noise, as you can see.

I wouldn't have attempted this shot with with these settings with either D200/D2x. There would have been heaps more clipping, less DR from shadow area in the church and highlights off the birds and clouds, and there would have been heaps more noise in the shadow area.

andrew
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby johnd on Fri May 11, 2007 2:11 pm

Wow Andrew, that's impressive at ISO 1250.
I'm sold and will be ordering one.
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby thelastname on Sun May 13, 2007 3:53 pm

The second one is a corker, the boys face says it all. :)
thelastname
Newbie
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:01 pm
Location: Warrnambool


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques