| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by zafra52 on Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:42 am
 What I like of this photograph is the perspective from the  Wheel of London of this iconic and famous building. Somehow all the wheeling and dealings and petty hypocrisies seem diminished as child's play. I found it difficult to take because of the reflections and the glass of the cabin and before long I found myself considering which would be the best time of  the day and the position of the sun for at 40+ pounds a turn you want to be sure you can take some half decent pictures.  
			
				 zafra52
Senior Member Posts: 4877Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pmLocation: Brisbane 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Marvin on Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:01 pm
 I like the perspective too. It looks like a miniature. I would like to see it with a tad more sky. Nikon D7000 
			
				 Marvin
Senior Member Posts: 1486Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pmLocation: Back in the hot Riverland, SA. 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:43 pm
 It is a great capture...and I am sure I would make the most of a trip on that Ferris wheel as well with a single ride being so pricey.    about more sky, so long as there is detailCameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by DanielA on Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:10 pm
 It is a nice angle.  It's a shame about the harsh light.  You did a good job in the conditions.  A bit of highlight recovery might help a bit. I went up around dusk  and that light wasn't bad.  I had the problem of scaffolding around the parliament and too many people in the pod.    Daniel 
			
				 DanielA
Senior Member Posts: 963Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pmLocation: Adelaide, South Australia
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by zafra52 on Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:05 pm
 Thanks for the comments. Unfortunately the sky wasnot interesting at all. I mean there was no clouds or
 even a nice blue sky and it was too bright so I took the
 picture the best I could to avoid the glass' reflections.
 I got another picture with more sky, but has more
 reflections and as I bring the little details there are in
 the sky the ugly reflections become even more prominent.
 The camera I took with me can only take Jpgs.
 I guess I can only put another sky, but that would be
 cheating.
 
			
				 zafra52
Senior Member Posts: 4877Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pmLocation: Brisbane 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by zafra52 on Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:57 pm
 With a fake sky...  
			
				 zafra52
Senior Member Posts: 4877Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pmLocation: Brisbane 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by CraigVTR on Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:59 am
 Reminds me of my first trip to London where I took a near identical shot.  The second shot with the fake sky looks more balanced but does not improve the shot that much in my opinion.  I think either version is fine depending on your preference.
 CraigLifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
 D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head.  SB800 x 2.
 
			
				 CraigVTR
Senior Member Posts: 1243Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pmLocation: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:55 am
 Nice pickture indeed. 40 quid? I agree, you would want to get your money's worth. How long can you spend in the thing? Is it just one revolution? President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by CraigVTR on Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:47 am
 ozimax wrote:Nice pickture indeed. 40 quid? I agree, you would want to get your money's worth. How long can you spend in the thing? Is it just one revolution?
 When I did the eye a few years ago it was one revolution @ about 20 minutes.CraigLifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
 D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head.  SB800 x 2.
 
			
				 CraigVTR
Senior Member Posts: 1243Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pmLocation: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:20 pm
 CraigVTR wrote:ozimax wrote:Nice pickture indeed. 40 quid? I agree, you would want to get your money's worth. How long can you spend in the thing? Is it just one revolution?
 When I did the eye a few years ago it was one revolution @ about 20 minutes.
 I think the French revolution was a little longer.  President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by zafra52 on Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:26 pm
 Yes, I think they are still revolting...   
			
				 zafra52
Senior Member Posts: 4877Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pmLocation: Brisbane 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |