| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by radar on Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:05 pm
 I haven't posted many photos lately, so here are two panos that I have put together lately. The first one is a pano from the top of Nobbys in Newcastle. We were lucky to have the flickr Newcastle Sundance group gain access for a sunset shoot on the weekend. We didn't get much colours but still very nice to be up there. Pano is 8 images.  Next one is a vertical pano of the Milky Way that I took recently on a trip to Tonga. This was 4 images.  If you click on the image, you will be able to get to the image on flickr and see a larger version. PTgui was used to stitch the images together and Capture NX2 to do some final work on them. Comments always welcomed cheers, AndréPhotography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
 (misc Nikon stuff)
 
			
				 radar
Senior Member Posts: 2823Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 amLocation: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:26 pm
 I do like that second image of the milky way, I am keen to do some stuff like this and I think this shot is tops. The first image confuses me a bit, are the left and right sides of the image delibrately out of focus? It does give me a sensation of tunnel vision which is strangely attractive, for awhile anyway   The choice of BW is also a good one, adds a different slant on a very abused location    
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:39 am
 Despite the selective focus in the first, it really draws me in.....great stuff! CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:07 am
 Upon a second look on the first image, there are quite obvious stitch lines in the clouds and more than one cloud 'looks' cloned, note i say looks, this could very well be the way the clouds were on the day! I think using CS5 and the content aware fill would sort these issues out in a matter of minutes   
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Remorhaz on Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:23 am
 That second image looks great     The first almost looks like you were using auto focus with a wide open aperture (was it quite dark at the time?) and it only achieved focus down the contrasty centre strip of land (and the distant city on the left and the close land on the right of middle) - the left and right sides of the image appear to be very out of focus. It's an interesting look if you did this on purpose but I don't think I like it.D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24) 
			
				 Remorhaz
Senior Member Posts: 2547Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by radar on Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:18 am
 Thanks for the comments, a few more details for the first pano: I did do the selective focus, added a blur vignette. Idea behind that was that I wanted to just have the city and leading dunes in focus. The original is sharp throughout. Lens used was the 24-120 f4 at 79mm, f9. Gerry, as for the clouds, that's the way they were, no cloning involved. As for the obvious stitch lines, not sure that I see those     even looking at the original full size. It was something different I was trying out in terms of the selective focus, thanks for the feedback. It was pretty monochromatic with the weather, so b&w was the way to go. Also, there was a southerly that had come up and was sort of blurring things naturally, hence I tried to show that with the treatment I used. cheers, AndréPhotography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
 (misc Nikon stuff)
 
			
				 radar
Senior Member Posts: 2823Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 amLocation: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:54 am
 radar wrote:Gerry, as for the clouds, that's the way they were, no cloning involved. As for the obvious stitch lines, not sure that I see those even looking at the original full size.
 Hey Andre, 'obvious' was probably a bit indulgent     however, below is a crop of the area that I am talking about, i am referring the the vertical join lines at roughly the left and right 3rd line and roughly in the middle of the image.  
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by radar on Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:34 am
 biggerry wrote:Hey Andre, 'obvious' was probably a bit indulgent     however, below is a crop of the area that I am talking about, i am referring the the vertical join lines at roughly the left and right 3rd line and roughly in the middle of the image.
 Geez you are picky     but now I see them, thanks for that. As you say previously, will be easy to fix. cheers, AndréPhotography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
 (misc Nikon stuff)
 
			
				 radar
Senior Member Posts: 2823Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 amLocation: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:53 am
 radar wrote:biggerry wrote:Hey Andre, 'obvious' was probably a bit indulgent     however, below is a crop of the area that I am talking about, i am referring the the vertical join lines at roughly the left and right 3rd line and roughly in the middle of the image.
 Geez you are picky     but now I see them, thanks for that. As you say previously, will be easy to fix. cheers, André
 yeah i feel a bit anal now     i swear they looked worse last night, musta been my tired eyes...   
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by radar on Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:08 pm
 Gerry, biggerry wrote:yeah i feel a bit anal now     i swear they looked worse last night, musta been my tired eyes...  
 Not a problem at all, good to have these things pointed out now, so if I decide to print it later, then saves hassles. Stitching errors show up much more on the final print. cheers, AndréPhotography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
 (misc Nikon stuff)
 
			
				 radar
Senior Member Posts: 2823Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 amLocation: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by zafra52 on Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:45 pm
 Both of them are very good. The first one willbe even better in larger size on a canvas on a
 wall. The second is the winner, in my book.
 
			
				 zafra52
Senior Member Posts: 4877Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pmLocation: Brisbane 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |