| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Remorhaz on Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:36 pm
 I recently travelled to Canberra for three days with 70+ children on a school camp with my daughter. I of course took many photos whilst I we were there and it was a great opportunity to test out my newly acquired Nikon 70-200/2.8 (just over 400 images (about 50% of the total) with this lens). This is one of my early efforts which I unfortunately shot wide open at f/2.8 and since I didn't nail the focus properly I didn't get enough depth of field and as such fail   Over the course of a couple days I did take a number of better portraits with the lens, however as murphy's law would have it they are all of other children... D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24) 
			
				 Remorhaz
Senior Member Posts: 2547Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:18 pm
 Remorhaz wrote: This is one of my early efforts which I unfortunately shot wide open at f/2.8 and since I didn't nail the focus properly I didn't get enough depth of field and as such fail 
 it still looks more than acceptable, the focus plane appears to be just behind the eyes, ie the hairline is really sharp. The bokeh is pretty sweet, as one would expect, you now have me wanting this darn lens.. at the end of teh day, its a good portrait and the flaws (focus and slight chopped off head) are diminished significantly due to the framing, and captured expression. If its one thing I have learnt, those two factors the latter moreso, override just about any technical flaw when it comes to kid portraits... 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by norwest on Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:23 pm
 The brokeh is silk. 
			
				norwest
			Member Posts: 265Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pmLocation: Namoi Valley North West NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:26 pm
 You throw away your backgrounds and stands, as this lens seems to change any background into something bokelicious. 
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Sylvia on Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:35 pm
 Woah.. nice boke! Nikons.Nikkor's.
 
			
				 Sylvia
Member Posts: 178Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:46 pmLocation: Central Coast 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Remorhaz on Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:41 pm
 biggerry wrote:it still looks more than acceptable, the focus plane appears to be just behind the eyes, ie the hairline is really sharp. The bokeh is pretty sweet, as one would expect, you now have me wanting this darn lens..
 norwest wrote:The brokeh is silk.
 surenj wrote:You throw away your backgrounds and stands, as this lens seems to change any background into something bokelicious.
 Sylvia wrote:Woah.. nice boke!
 Yes mucho happy with the bokeh - smooth and sweet. In this case the background was mostly just grass. For most of the portraits I took I was shooting at f/4 for a little more DoF (to cope with subject and camera operator movement) and mostly with trees, gardens and flower beds and such in the background but it still renders them as a very pleasant monet haze (not a single flat colour like this but still very nice and smooth).D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24) 
			
				 Remorhaz
Senior Member Posts: 2547Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by PiroStitch on Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:53 am
 I don't know what you're unhappy about because that image is tops!  For portraits I tend to aim for at least the nose, eyes and mouth to be sharp, however I've bent that rule whenever I saw fit.  What you have there is top notch and I highly doubt the parent of that girl will be unhappy with what you've captured. 
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:15 pm
 Very nice image Rodney, and yes, the 70-200 (Canon or Nikon) is a classic lens with a great focal length. There's not much you can't photograph with it. You've done very well.
 Ozi.
 President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Remorhaz on Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:33 pm
 PiroStitch wrote:I don't know what you're unhappy about because that image is tops!  For portraits I tend to aim for at least the nose, eyes and mouth to be sharp, however I've bent that rule whenever I saw fit.  What you have there is top notch and I highly doubt the parent of that girl will be unhappy with what you've captured.
 The aim was to get the eyes super sharp but I missed it by a hair I expect. I do very much like the shot - the unhappiness is knowing I could have got it just that bit better by nailing the eyes    and yes the parent (me) is happy   ozimax wrote:Very nice image Rodney, and yes, the 70-200 (Canon or Nikon) is a classic lens with a great focal length. There's not much you can't photograph with it. You've done very well.
 Yep - very happy with the lens so far - as with many things - should have done it a long time ago   I've yet to try it with the TC (1.4) that I bought a little while back - perhaps I'll have to go out with Gerry birding or something sometime    - that beach location looked pretty sweet as well  D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24) 
			
				 Remorhaz
Senior Member Posts: 2547Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by PiroStitch on Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:13 pm
 Remorhaz wrote:The aim was to get the eyes super sharp but I missed it by a hair I expect. I do very much like the shot - the unhappiness is knowing I could have got it just that bit better by nailing the eyes    and yes the parent (me) is happy  
 Stop pixel peeping      
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:44 pm
 PiroStitch wrote:Stop pixel peeping    
    Although you'd want to correct that white balance though.    
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Remorhaz on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:05 pm
 surenj wrote:Although you'd want to correct that white balance though.   
 Yeah I know - lots and lots of lush bright greenery made for lots of green reflected light which makes for mucho problemo. I've had another go at this portrait adjusting both temp and tint by eye.D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24) 
			
				 Remorhaz
Senior Member Posts: 2547Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |