| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:27 am
 Saturday week back I shot my first wedding with the OM-D plus a few prime lens. I also shot with a borrowed Canon 50D/24-105 combo. Here's a few images from the Olympus setup. Would I shoot an an entire wedding with just M43 gear? Sure, but I would need to add the 12mm F2 prime lens to the stable to enable 24mm wide focal length, plus an Olympus TTL flash.  Olympus 45mm  Wedding1  by Ozimax , on Flickr Olympus 75mm  Wedding2  by Ozimax , on Flickr Olympus 45mm  Wedding3  by Ozimax , on Flickr Olympus 45mm  Wedding4  by Ozimax , on FlickrPresident, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by sirhc55 on Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:07 pm
 There’s nowt wrong with those shots Ozi  Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:30 pm
 sirhc55 wrote:There’s nowt wrong with those shots Ozi  
 As opposed to your spelling Chris...  President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by sirhc55 on Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:11 pm
 If yer com from Yorkshire laddie then you would know what nowt means   Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:49 am
 Some great images there!! Who said the smaller sensors cant provide nice Bokeh?? CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:37 am
 #2 holy bokeh batman
 nice stuff ozi and I really like that 3rd image, simple with very effective negative pace.
 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:20 pm
 biggerry wrote:#2 holy bokeh batman
 nice stuff ozi and I really like that 3rd image, simple with very effective negative pace.
 Interesting post of yours Gerry. I was always told (by many an experienced photog) that a portrait must be in portrait orientation. I actually like portraits in landscape orientation, if that makes sense, with plenty of negative space.President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by PiroStitch on Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:41 pm
 Lovely stuff with the second and third images. I prefer taking portraits in a landscape orientation nowadays.  There are more options for composition and for me, it's easier   
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Geoff M on Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:22 pm
 You would have to be pleased with those wether you were the photographer or the happy couple. Great work. 
			
				 Geoff M
Senior Member Posts: 1225Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pmLocation: Tamborine Mountain QLD. 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Matt. K on Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:56 pm
 OziFor me, these have a nostalgic 60's feel to them. I don't know if you deliberatly set out to achieve that or if the Ollie tends to manufacture that style...but it's different and I like it.
 Regards
 Matt. K
 
			
				 Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM Posts: 9981Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pmLocation: North Nowra 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:41 pm
 Matt. K wrote:OziFor me, these have a nostalgic 60's feel to them. I don't know if you deliberatly set out to achieve that or if the Ollie tends to manufacture that style...but it's different and I like it.
 Matt, I thought exactly the same thing. I think it's the Olympic algorithom/processing/whatever thing. It has been said before that the E-M5 produces film-like images which most people like. As for the setting, environmental portraiture seems to be the rage these days among wedding photogs, (and I took some of those too), but sometimes I like plain old fashioned classic portraits. I think the happy couple like the results which is all I need care about.President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |