| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by leek on Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:33 am
 OK... Here are my reject photos for the "THREE"  Challenge: 
 Critique please... Click for bigger pics... <table width=400 border=1> <tr><td>  </td><td>Three Towers...  Rejected coz I thought it looked far far too much like Rokstar's winning entry in the previous comp...</td></tr>
 <tr><td>Three Llamas  - While these were rolling around in the dust they still didn't make for a very interesting photo in the end...</td><td>  </td></tr>
 <tr><td>  </td><td>Moment of Awe  - When will we be good enough to skate with the big kids??? 
 Who knows... Maybe I should have submitted this one...</td></tr>
 <tr><td>Three Palms  - A snap of some Palm trees as a reserve</td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td>I thought that this one wasfar too corny!!! </td></tr>
 </table> 
			
				 leek
Senior Member Posts: 3135Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pmLocation: Lane Cove, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by flipfrog on Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:30 am
 my fav of them is number 1
 nice perspective Leek, and great BLUE!
 
			
				 flipfrog
Senior Member Posts: 626Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pmLocation: Vancouver Canada
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by MCWB on Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:31 am
 1, 3 and 5 all do it for me. Agree with your comments about 1, but it's still a great shot. The composition in 3 and 5 is great, perhaps a bit tighter crop in 5? Well done!    Edit: P.S. your post count is rather devilish at the moment, if you never post again we'll know why!   
			
				 MCWB
Senior Member Posts: 2121Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pmLocation: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70 
 
		
		
			
			
 by leek on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:08 am
 MCWB wrote:Edit: P.S. your post count is rather devilish at the moment, if you never post again we'll know why!  
 Ah yes         - I'd better get rid of that... Now 667... 
			
				 leek
Senior Member Posts: 3135Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pmLocation: Lane Cove, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by MHD on Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:15 am
 yes agree on number one... Awesome photo but would be voted down due to its resemblence.. 
			
				 MHD
Moderator Posts: 5829Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pmLocation: Chicago Burbs
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by SteveGriffin on Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:23 pm
 I actually like #5 the best even though it is a bit 'corny'. Nice work Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
 So many things to do - so little time.
 
			
				 SteveGriffin
Senior Member Posts: 815Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pmLocation: Rochedale Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:50 pm
 John, love 1 and 5, especially 5. Mate your rejects whoop my entry!    
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by beetleboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:50 pm
 I hope I don't sound too harsh but I find these all a little too literal. I think there are some nice shots (1 and 5 in particular) but for a comp like this I think a straight "3 x object" would have to knock people's socks off..
 Please remember this is just my opinion! Sorry if i've stood on your toes.
 Liam =] PS  - insert withdrawal clause here in case every turns on me!! 
			
				 beetleboy
Senior Member Posts: 821Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 amLocation: Highbury, Adelaide
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by johndec on Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:56 pm
 DISCLAIMER: LAME ATTEMPT AT HUMOUR FOLLOWS:
 Beetleboy,
 You may be right.  If the topic of the current challenge was "4" , it may be easier to think outside the square    
			
				 johndec
Senior Member Posts: 1327Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pmLocation: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200.... 
 
		
		
			
			
 by beetleboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:00 pm
 John, that doesn't even come a close second to my dad's lame humour so you're pretty safe there!!
 Example: last night he said there wasn't "mush-room" on our pizza's for mushrooms! And that's one of his greatest ever performances!
 Liam =] PS  - pity me! 
			
				 beetleboy
Senior Member Posts: 821Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 amLocation: Highbury, Adelaide
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by leek on Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:00 pm
 beetleboy wrote:I hope I don't sound too harsh but I find these all a little too literal. I think there are some nice shots (1 and 5 in particular) but for a comp like this I think a straight "3 x object" would have to knock people's socks off.. Please remember this is just my opinion! Sorry if i've stood on your toes. Liam =] PS  - insert withdrawal clause here in case every turns on me!!
 Everyone's entitled to an opinion... and to a personal interpretation... 
 Maybe that's why these were my rejects... 
			
				 leek
Senior Member Posts: 3135Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pmLocation: Lane Cove, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by beetleboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:03 pm
 Good point Leek!
 In hindsight I think No. 1 may have actually had a chance..It's really growing on me and I think I felt my socks working their way off!!
 
 Liam =]
 
			
				 beetleboy
Senior Member Posts: 821Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 amLocation: Highbury, Adelaide
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by digitor on Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:13 pm
 beetleboy wrote:John, that doesn't even come a close second to my dad's lame humour so you're pretty safe there!! Example: last night he said there wasn't "mush-room" on our pizza's for mushrooms! And that's one of his greatest ever performances! Liam =] PS  - pity me!
 Well, as the great Lonnie Donegan sang - 
 My dustbin's full of toadstools!  
 How do you know it's full? 
 Cos there ain't mushroom inside!!
 Groan....
 CheersWhat's another word for "thesaurus"? 
			
				 digitor
Senior Member Posts: 925Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pmLocation: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |