| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by anubis on Mon May 02, 2005 12:52 pm
 Hi guys,
 Well this is My First Post.
 Enclosed is an image from my favourite Formula 1 team Mclaren. Taken with a D70 with a NIKKOR 70-300 ED Lens at the 2005 Melbourne Grandprix. Note it was taken through a Grill at about 200MM using JPEG FINE mod e, ISO 200 on the camera. 
 Used Photoshop to crop and resize for display on the web, no image manipulations (although it seems to have lost a sig amount of image data in the upload to pixspot).
 Am very interested in comments and suggestions to improve , which I am sure there are plenty     
			
				 anubis
Member Posts: 248Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pmLocation: Rose Bay 
 
		
		
			
			
 by MCWB on Mon May 02, 2005 1:14 pm
 Firstly, welcome! Secondly, that's a great shot, especially considering the conditions. My only criticism is that it's not that sharp, but the image still works. Any more from the weekend? I *so* want a press pass to the GP, no more pesky fences!   
			
				 MCWB
Senior Member Posts: 2121Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pmLocation: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70 
 
		
		
			
			
 by genji on Mon May 02, 2005 1:20 pm
 welcome anubis, (a reference to sg1?)
 yeah, the fence spoils an otherwise great image.
 
			
				 genji
Senior Member Posts: 570Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pmLocation: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sirhc55 on Mon May 02, 2005 1:27 pm
 Welcome Anubis - considering the obstacles this is a very fine pic  Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
 by gstark on Mon May 02, 2005 1:29 pm
 Welcome.
 Great shot; where were you seated to get this sort of view?
 The reason the image is a little soft is the lens, btw . The 70-300 isn't the sharpest piece of glass doing the rounds.g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Nnnnsic on Mon May 02, 2005 2:02 pm
 I'll post some of my 70-300 shots from the race soon so you can get the idea of how soft the 70-300 really can be... 
			
				 Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing Posts: 7770Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 amLocation: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Mon May 02, 2005 2:22 pm
 Anubis, welcome and great shot even with the fence, the fence just takes a little from it. 
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by anubis on Mon May 02, 2005 3:52 pm
 Hi guys, thanks for the feedback, am enclosing a couple of other photos I took during the weekend, Montoyas Mclaren was taken at 300mm from the Clark Stand (quite a distance from the track and behind wire), whereas the pic below this of the Mild Seven Renault was taken while in scruitineering after the race in the pits.
     Speaking of soft images what zoom lens could I purchase that would sharpen up these images cost less than say AUD 1400 and not weigh a tonne (i.e. 1.5 Kgs)....? What are you all using...? PS : The first pick I posed was from about 100 metres from turn 1 on the main straight I took it at Friday Free Practice standing in the rain..... and the name Anubis, one of my hobbies is Egyptology so its from that, although I am also a big fan of sg1!. 
			
				 anubis
Member Posts: 248Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pmLocation: Rose Bay 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Manta on Mon May 02, 2005 4:08 pm
 Welcome Anubis and thanks for posting these shots.
Being a Merc owner, I'm a big McLaren fan too. I was in Melbourne 2 years ago to see Coulthard take them to victory and it was a sweet result. Love to get back there soon.
 
 I'm not too concerned about the fences in your photos. It's hard enough to get a clean image even without the fences as your panning has to be spot on. I find I don't even see the blur of the wire and concentrate more on the car detail.
 
 Well done.
 
			
				 Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year Posts: 3815Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pmLocation: Hamilton Qld
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by ozczecho on Mon May 02, 2005 4:20 pm
 Like the shot from Clark stand...its not a bad location to watch the race from...
 I thought Montoya played tennis...   
			
				 ozczecho
Senior Member Posts: 785Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pmLocation: Beecroft, Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by gstark on Mon May 02, 2005 4:39 pm
 I use the Nikkor 80-400 VR. 
 Much sharper than the 70-300 - they're really on different planets - and priced just a tad beyond the pricing you mentioned, if you get it imported from HK. See our bargain pages ...
 Glen: not any more; he found it was far too dangerous.  g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
 by leek on Tue May 03, 2005 3:39 pm
 Great shots anubis... 
Nice to get up close and personal like that...
 
			
				 leek
Senior Member Posts: 3135Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pmLocation: Lane Cove, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sirhc55 on Tue May 03, 2005 3:43 pm
 Yes, great shots Anubis - as to a lens in your price range there is always the Sigma 70-200mm  Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
 by anubis on Tue May 03, 2005 7:35 pm
 Hi Guys, BTW  thanks for the Welcome !!!.
 Have noticed that Nikon produce(d) a 80-200 D ED Lens with a constant F2.8 aperture. Do any of you guys have it and still use it? If so do you recommend I get one?. Also, does the lens require a tripod/monopod or can it be used effectively handheld....?
 I suppose one of the things that I would like is that for my zoom not to weigh a ton. 
 Thanks again for all the feedback. 
			
				 anubis
Member Posts: 248Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pmLocation: Rose Bay 
 
		
		
			
			
 by birddog114 on Tue May 03, 2005 7:38 pm
 anubis wrote:Hi Guys, BTW  thanks for the Welcome !!!. Have noticed that Nikon produce(d) a 80-200 D ED Lens with a constant F2.8 aperture. Do any of you guys have it and still use it? If so do you recommend I get one?. Also, does the lens require a tripod/monopod or can it be used effectively handheld....? I suppose one of the things that I would like is that for my zoom not to weigh a ton.  Thanks again for all the feedback.
 The Nikkor 80-200 AF-D/ AF-S are the old production from Nikon, the replacement is Nikkor 70-200VR, you can still buy the 80-200/2.8 AF-D with tripod collar new but the AF-S 80-200/2.8 is hard to find.Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
 
			
				 birddog114
Senior Member Posts: 15881Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pmLocation: Belmore,Sydney 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |